Public Expenditure In Scotland, and Monitoring the Financial Aspects of
Devolution.
A Critique of GERS: Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Fraser of Allander Institute Quarterly Economic Commentary, vol 24, no.1 (1998).
This paper is a critique both of the detail in GERS, and of the way GERS is
commonly used.
download this paper
The Implications of the Barnett Formula
Cuthbert, J.R. : Saltire Paper no.1, (1998).
Initial paper on Barnett squeeze: points out the likely long term problems which the Barnett formula is likely to imply for the funding of the Scottish Parliament, and some of the resulting implications.
Income Tax and the Funding of the Scottish Parliament
Cuthbert, M., Cuthbert, J.R.: Saltire Paper no.1, (1998).
Early analysis of various aspects of income tax raising powers of Scottish Parliament. Identifies various problems with use of these powers, related to the perverse way in which the funding arrangements for Scottish devolution have been organised.
Monitoring the Financial Aspects of the Devolution Settlement: Issues and
Data Requirements
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Fraser of Allander Institute Quarterly Economic Commentary, vol 24, no.4, (1999).
To some extent overtaken by the later monitoring paper below, (FOA, Dec
2002), but still contains relevant material, e.g., on whether Scotland actually
fully benefits from European funding.
download this paper
A Tax Whose Time has Passed
Cuthbert, J.R.,
Cuthbert, M.: in “Scotland’s Enterprise Deficit”, Policy Institute,
Edinburgh, (2000).
This paper deals with the dilemma posed by Non Domestic Rates in the
devolution context. Also has more general implications for the debate about
fiscal autonomy.
The Barnett Squeeze in Spending Review 2000
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Fraser of Allander Institute Quarterly Economic Commentary, Vol 26, No2: (May, 2001).
The Barnett squeeze is important for understanding the context of Scottish
Executive budget decisions. This whole question will become much more relevant
if, as seems inevitable, we are moving into a period of relative public
expenditure restraint.
download this paper
See also accompanying tables.
The Effect of Relative Population Growth on the Barnett Squeeze
Cuthbert, J.R: Fraser of Allander Institute Quarterly Economic Commentary, Vol 26, No2: (May, 2001).
A fairly technical topic: but sobering on the extent of Scotland’s relative
population decline: and essential for understanding how this will impact on
convergence in per-capita spending levels.
download this
paper
See also
accompanying
charts.
The Treasury Funding Statements as a Tool in Monitoring the Devolution
Settlement
Cuthbert, M., Cuthbert, J.R: Fraser of Allander Institute Quarterly Economic Commentary, Vol 27, No4: (December, 2002).
This paper demonstrates the
importance of the Treasury funding statement in the monitoring context, since it
is the only source which shows in detail where the reserved/devolved boundary
lies. The paper also points to a number of areas where Scotland is losing out
because the interface with Whitehall departments is not working properly.
download this
paper
Monitoring and Measurement Issues Posed by Devolution in the United Kingdom
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M: invited paper given at conference on
Measuring Government Performance, organised by the Statistics User Committee, at
the Royal Society, London, (November 2003).
Overview of issues involved in monitoring devolution.
download this paper
A Constructive Critique of the
Treasury's Country and Regional Analysis of Public Expenditure
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M: Fraser of Allander Institute
Quarterly Economic Commentary, Vol 30, No.3: (2005).
This paper, based on data obtained under the Freedom of Information Act,
demonstrates substantial weaknesses in the Treasury’s published data: for
example, the Treasury’s comparison of identifiable expenditure between Scotland
and England excludes £4.4 billion of expenditure from the English side of the
comparison, where expenditure on the corresponding services is included for
Scotland. Extensive proposals are suggested for improving the Treasury data
which, if implemented, would also have a positive effect on service delivery.
download this
paper
Illuminating Whitehall's
Disinterest
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: (importance of Freedom of Information Act): Scottish Left Review, Issue 31:
(November/December 2005).
Demonstrates the importance of the Freedom of Information Act in shedding light on devolution: and makes a strong case for the Act not to be modified, (as is currently threatened).
Comment to Treasury on their response to the Public Expenditure Statistical Analysis user consultation.
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: ( August 2006).
In 2005/06, the Treasury carried out a consultation on the development of the key Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses: (see relevant page on Treasury website). Our first response to this consultation was to submit our "Constructive Critique" paper- see above. The Treasury response to the overall consultation is a disappointing document. This note is our comment on the Treasury response.
Some Assorted Problems with Statistical and Economic data, and Their Implications.
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: talk given at Statistics Commission Seminar on "Do we have the data we need to measure the economy in Scotland?", Royal Society of Edinburgh, September 6th 2006.
By focussing on a number of specific examples, identifies a number of areas where significant improvements are required.
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: open letter to Wendy Alexander, M.S.P., dated 24 March 2007.
An open letter to Wendy Alexander, convenor of the Finance Committee of the Scottish Parliament. We were invited to appear before the Finance Committee on 16th January, when they were considering GERS, but declined the invitation. However, since January we have done substantial further work on GERS, and have identified some very significant new errors. This open letter brings this work into the public domain, and contradicts the views on the quality of GERS expressed by several of the panel on 16th January.
Time to Stop the Abuse of GERS.
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Scots Independent, April 1st 2007.
Builds on recent work we have carried out on GERS: highlights a very misleading use of GERS in guidance material issued by Learning and Teaching Scotland, ( a government funded quango), in connection with the Higher Level Modern Studies examination.
Government Expenditure and Revenues in Scotland (GERS)
Cuthbert, M., Cuthbert, J.R.: Powerpoint presentation of seminar given at University of Edinburgh, Centre for Public Health Policy, 23rd April, 2007.
Seminar at Edinburgh University summarising our findings, conclusions and recommendations on GERS.
How Scotland will be Disadvantaged in the Longer Term by Recent Changes in Government Accounting for European Structural Funds
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Fraser of Allander Institute Quarterly Economic Commentary, Vol 31, No.4: (July 2007).
Explains how a recent change in the Treasury rules for accounting for European Structural Fund receipts means that Scotland will be materially damaged in the longer term- and suggests what needs to be done to rectify the situation.
A New Twist to an Old Scandal: How Recent Changes in Government Accounting for European Structural Funds Mean that Scotland will Lose Out
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Scots Independent, Issue 942, August 1st, 2007.
A less technical version of the preceding paper.
Opening up the books on the true state of Scottish finances
Cuthbert, M., Cuthbert, J.R.: Sunday Herald, 22nd June, 2008.
This article welcomes the appearance of the Scottish Government's latest GERS publication. The latest GERS incorporates significant methodological improvements over earlier versions. There is still, however, plenty of scope for further improvements, both in GERS, and Scotland's wider economic statistics.
Perverse Incentive Effect of the Calman Income Tax Proposals
Cuthbert, J.R.: note sent to Scottish Government, June 2009.
Identifies a perverse incentive effect which is implicit in the Calman income tax proposals, and which could pose a grave threat to a Scottish government operating under the Calman rules.
Open Letter to the Calman Commission: Technical Failings in the Calman Proposals on Income Tax
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: open letter sent to Calman Commission secretariat, 16th July 2009.
Builds upon material in immediately preceding paper, and identifies technical flaws in the arrangements for a Scottish income tax proposed by the Calman Commission - then examines the likely consequences. Among these is a real danger that the proposals, if implemented would force a Scottish government into a deflationary trap. Also proposes solution to identified problems.
How Calman's Income Tax Proposals Set a Trap for Scotland
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Scots Independent, Issue 966, August, 2009.
This article is a more accessible version of the material in our open letter to Calman.
French and German Recovery: What Does this Say about the Euro?
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Scots Independent, Issue 967, September, 2009.
Points out that recent news that the French and German economies may be starting to recover in fact highlights worrying evidence of a growing split in the eurozone, with a number of economies suffering a growing loss of competitiveness relative to the eurozone core.
Do Official Statistics Provide an Adequate Basis for the Debate about the UK Economy?
Cuthbert, J.R.: Invited talk given at Royal Statistical Society Conference, Edinburgh, 11 September 2009.
This is the slightly expanded, (by inclusion of fuller references, etc), version of the talk. The talk uses three illustrative examples to argue that official statistics has failed badly.
Do Official Statistics Provide an Adequate Basis for Debate about Scottish Independence: or, indeed, about the process of devolution.
Cuthbert, M.: Invited talk given at Royal Statistical Society Conference, Edinburgh, 11 September 2009.
This is the full version of the paper on which the talk was based.
Correspondence with Scotland Office about Calman tax proposals.
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: October 2009.
After submitting our open letter to Calman, we had a meeting with Scotland Office officials. The Scotland Office subsequently emailed the Canadian Professor Boadway, for his advice on two issues. This is our reply, which is essentially self explanatory, to the email we subsequently received from the Scotland Office.
Calman White Paper Makes Things Worse on Tax
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Scots Independent, Issue 971, January, 2010.
This article points out that, under the transitional arrangements proposed in the Westminster government's White Paper on Calman, the technical problems we identified with the original Calman tax proposals would be much worse: under the transitional arrangements, there would be no possibility of the Scottish government lowering its tax rate, and at the same time increasing its revenues.
Issues on Calman Tax Proposals Still Unresolved
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary, Vol 33, No. 3, February 2010.
This is our definitive account of the technical problems with the income tax proposals in Calman, as amended by the Westminster government White Paper. We show that, far from addressing the problems with the original Calman proposals, the transitional arrangements in the White Paper would actually place a Scottish government in an even worse fiscal trap.
Murphy's £75 billion Claim Leaves a Bad Taste
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Scots Independent, Issue 973, March, 2010.
Jim Murphy's department, the Scotland Office, recently produced a report arguing that Scotland had experienced a £75bn bonus from devolution. This is a critique of the Scotland Office paper. We also argue that the debate on Scotland's economy and future is unlikely to move on until an integrated set of accounts is produced, giving a complete picture of the financial flows into and out of the Scottish economy, (and including oil as an integral part of the economy.)
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Public Finance, 11th March 2010.
This is a more popular version of the above Fraser of Allander paper on Calman.
Cuthbert, M., Cuthbert, J.R.: Scots Independent, Issue 974, April 2010.
Critique of a report produced by the Centre for Public Policy for Regions, looking at the fiscal balance of an independent Scotland.
download this paper
Response to the second question on the consultation
paper, relating to question 1 in the referendum.
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Response to Scottish Government consultation on draft Referendum (Scotland) Bill: April 2010.
This response to the referendum consultation is about the possible question dealing with implementation of the Calman proposals on income tax. Our response builds on our previous research on Calman, and argues that, given the flaws in the Calman proposals, the option of implementing Calman should not be included in the proposed referendum.
Scotland and the UK National Debt: Further issues arising from the CPPR report.
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Scots Independent, Issue 975, May 2010.
This continues the critique of the CPPR report which we began in our last Scots Independent article. This article looks particularly at the question of Scotland and the UK national debt, and argues that this issue is much less of a concern when viewed in the context of the overall net worth of the public sector.
Welsh Exercise on Needs Sets a Trap for Scotland
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Scots Independent, Issue 976, June 2010.
This is a critique of a recent report produced for the “Independent Commission for Funding and Finance for Wales.” We argue that the Welsh analysis is an inadequate way of assessing the need for public services. More importantly, we also argue that “need for public services” should not be the primary focus: much more important is to consider the need for achieving better economic balance between the different parts of the UK.
The Osborne Budget: Implications for Scotland
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.:Scots Independent, Issue 977, July 2010.
First of two articles looking at the likely implications for Scotland of the Osborne budget – and why these are likely to be dire. Against this background, the Westminster government is likely to attempt shift responsibility for the coming pain by implementing the Calman tax proposals, or some other package of limited fiscal autonomy. We argue that any such scheme offered by Westminster is likely to be inadequate and damaging: and hence should be treated with great caution.
Time to Move Beyond GERS: An Approach to Estimating Flows of Private Finance for the Scottish Economy
Cuthbert, J. R. Paper SESCG 2010/1/2 discussed at Scottish Economic Statistics
Consultants’ Group, at meeting on 18 October 2010.
Suggests that, instead of regarding the financial flows on Scotland’s
government account in isolation, (essentially, the traditional GERS debate),
these flows should be seen as one component in a more integrated set of
accounts: and addresses some of the issues involved in estimating key aggregates
in this wider approach.
Holtham Misrepresents our Position on Welsh Needs Exercise
Cuthbert, J. R., Cuthbert, M.: Scots Independent, Issue 981, November 2010.
Following our critique of the Holtham Commission work on needs assessment, (see above), a response by Holtham was published in the October 2010 Scots Independent: Holtham’s response can be accessed here. This is our reply to Holtham, showing that he has significantly misrepresented our views.
The Budget: Issues and Challenges.
Cuthbert, J. R., Cuthbert, M.: Scots Independent, Issue 982, December 2010.
This is our comment on the Budget which John Swinney presented to the Scottish Parliament on 17 November.
Flawed Scotland Bill Tax Proposals – A Trap for Labour
Cuthbert, J. R., Cuthbert, M.: Paper published on Scottish Left Review website, December 2010, and in printed edition of SLR, issue 62.
This article points out the flaws in the income tax proposals in the recently published Scotland Bill: and also points out the political implications, which are likely to affect Labour in particular.
Wendy’s Committee Fails Scotland Badly.
Cuthbert, J. R., Cuthbert, M.: Scottish Left Review Issue 63, March 2011.
Shows how evidence given to the Scotland Bill committee, arguing against our critique of the tax raising powers in the Bill, is flawed. Also shows how later work we have carried out strengthens the concern that flaws the proposed tax arrangements will lead to the income tax rate in Scotland being too high.
Why a Scottish Government, operating under
Calman, will always raise more in tax for a given increase in tax rate than an
independent or UK government facing the same Laffer curve.
Cuthbert, J. R.
Technical note referred to in the preceding paper.
Self Delusion at Holyrood on Scotland Bill
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: Scots Independent, Issue 986, April 2011.
This paper points out the deficiencies in the scrutiny of the Calman tax proposals carried out by the Scotland Bill Committee of the Scottish parliament.
Evidence given to Scotland Bill Committee of Scottish Parliament, in preparation for appearance before committee on 13 September 2011
Cuthbert, J. R., Cuthbert M.
We argue in this evidence that there are technical flaws with the Scotland Bill income tax proposals. The effect is likely to be that a Scottish government operating under these rules would set a tax rate which is too high. This is likely to have adverse deflationary effects on the Scottish economy. Annex 3 to our evidence is available here.
An Appearance before the Scotland Bill Committee
Cuthbert, J. R., Cuthbert M.: Scots Independent, Issue 992, October 2011.
This article reports on our appearance at the Scotland Bill Committee on 13th September. Far from allaying our concerns about the damaging effects of the Scotland Bill income tax proposals, the discussion and other evidence in fact confirmed our worries.
Cuthbert, J. R., Cuthbert M.: Chapter in the book “Scotland’s Economic Future” edited by Donald MacKay, published by Reform Scotland, October 2011.
We show how GERS, from its inception, was an essentially political document: and how, despite recent technical improvements, it remains the focus of an inherently sterile annual debate. What we argue is that the key to moving on to an altogether more productive debate is to replace the partial treatment in GERS with a full set of balanced accounts, showing all of the external flows into and out of the Scottish economy.
Cuthbert M., Cuthbert J. R.: Public Finance, Blog Section, 8th December 2011.
Shorter version of the paper described in the next entry.
How the Proposed Changes in the NHS in
England will have serious Repercussions for Scotland and Wales.
Cuthbert M., Cuthbert J. R.: Scots Independent, Issue 995, January 2012.
Explains how the proposed NHS reforms in England will adversely affect the Scottish Government’s budget: and therefore why, counter to the conventional unionist view of the West Lothian question, Scottish MPs should be voting at Westminster on this issue.
You are absolutely wrong on the structural funds, Mr. Moore
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: published on “Bella Caledonia” blog, April 2013.
The UK government’s recent announcement on how it had decided to share the UK structural fund allocation among the countries of the UK was hailed by Michael Moore as a triumph for the union. This paper shows how, on the contrary, Scotland has been badly penalised on its receipt of structural funds, precisely because it is part of the UK.
Issues surrounding the sharing of UK debt post independence
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: paper published by Jimmy Reid Foundation, January
2014.
Discusses various issues surrounding the question of the sharing of the UK’s
debt after independence. Concludes that the negotiations should be informed by a
recognition of the size of the cumulative fiscal surplus, (estimated at over
£150 billion), which Scotland would by now possess if it had achieved
independence in 1980: by an acknowledgement of the implications of quantitative
easing: and by a recognition of the principles of the Vienna convention.
download this paper
Evidence submitted to Scottish Parliament Finance Committee
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: written evidence, submitted before appearance to give oral evidence on 30 April 2014, in relation to the Committee's inquiry on Scotland’s public finances post 2014.
Our note covers five separate topics. Among other things, it argues that the Barnett Formula is unlikely to be sustainable in its present form in the event of a “no” vote: that proposals to increase the Calman tax threshold would need to be handled very carefully: and reviews issues surrounding debt sharing in the event of a “yes” vote, including the important implications of quantitative easing.
Note on calculation of Scotland’s notional cumulative fiscal balance, assuming it had become independent in 1980
Cuthbert, J.R.: note, and supporting spreadsheet, submitted to Finance Committee, following appearance before Committee on 30 April 2014: 5 May 2014.
Shows how, if Scotland had become independent in 1980, it could by now reasonably have expected to be in possession of a sovereign fund amounting to around £150 billion.
download this paper, and supporting spreadsheet
The Treasury’s Union Dividend: Flawed and Meaningless
Cuthbert, J.R., Cuthbert, M.: published by “Options for Scotland”, 13th August
2014.
Shows that there are serious technical flaws with the Treasury analysis :
but, fundamentally, argues that the basis of the Treasury’s approach is so
ill-conceived that it renders their attempt to calculate a “union dividend”
essentially meaningless.
download this paper
Whitehall bias and underperformance
Cuthbert, J. R. Cuthbert, M: published on Newsnet Scotland 21 August 2014.
Builds on our “Options for Scotland” paper on the Union Dividend, and draws out what this illustrates about the decline of the UK civil service. A similar note was also published on the “Open Democracy” blog on 26 August.
download this paper
Treasury’s Union Dividend Deeply
Flawed
Cuthbert, J. R. Cuthbert, M: to be published by “Academics for Yes, Scotland”,
2014.
Summarises our critique of the union dividend, and stresses in particular the
Treasury’s failure to model the funding of the Scottish government under
continuation of the union.
The IFS “observation” on funding Scotland’s NHS ignores the key risk to the NHS within the UK
Cuthbert, J. R. Cuthbert, M: published on Bella Caledonia, 12 September 2014.
A critique of the recent IFS intervention in the debate about the risk to
Scotland’s NHS: points out that the IFS completely ignore the key issue of the
consequences of privatisation in England.
BBC repeats error – that the English subsidise Scotland
Cuthbert, J. R., Cuthbert, M.: published on Bella Caledonia, 8 October 2014.
This is about a letter we sent to the BBC, complaining about a statement made
by Robert Peston, that England subsidises Scotland.
download this
paper
BBC Round 2: It turns out Peston missed out the oil
Cuthbert, J. R., Cuthbert, M.: published on Bella Caledonia, 26 October 2014.
Contains the BBC’s response to our earlier letter, and our reply. We identify
serious errors in the analysis underlying Peston’s statement: in particular, he
managed to miss out Scotland’s oil revenues!
The effect of relative population growth on the Barnett Formula
Cuthbert, J. R.: paper submitted to Finance Committee, after giving evidence to Committee on 22 April.
Explains the importance of relative population change as a factor moderating the operation of the Barnett formula.
download this paper
More Nonsense from the BBC
Cuthbert, J. R., Cuthbert, M.: published on Bella Caledonia, 3rd May 2015.
Further instalment in long running saga with BBC.
The Barnett formula under the Smith reforms
Cuthbert, J. R.: Fraser of Allander Institute Economic Commentary, Vol (39)1, June 2015.
Models the operation of the post-Smith fiscal settlement as it is currently proposed: and shows that what will result will be an unstable settlement which unduly penalises Scotland.
Barnett after Smith: Not a Good Outlook
Cuthbert, J. R.: published on Bella Caledonia, 26 June 2015.
Reports on the main conclusions in the previous paper.
download this paper
Written Evidence to the House of Lords Select Committee
on Economic Affairs: The devolution of public finances in the United Kingdom
Cuthbert, J. R.: written evidence submitted before giving oral evidence to Committee on 9th September.
Note submitted before giving oral evidence to the Committee on the fiscal framework after the Smith reforms. Highlights in particular the problem of how the proposed indexation arrangements will penalise Scotland.
download this
paper
Written Evidence to the House of Lords Select Committee
on Economic Affairs: The devolution of public finances in the United Kingdom
Cuthbert, M: written evidence submitted before giving oral evidence to Committee on 9th September.
Note submitted before giving oral evidence to the Committee on the fiscal framework after the Smith reforms. Highlights a number of issues, including problems of transparency and data availability.
Modelling Scotland’s Fiscal Settlement
Cuthbert, J. R.: Note submitted to House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee
following evidence session on 9th September.
Gives proofs of some properties of Holtham indexation which I had mentioned
in oral evidence to the committee.
Who was Right in the Andrew Neil Scottish
Budget Row
Jim and Margaret Cuthbert: published in Bella Caledonia, 26 October, 2015.
Makes sense of competing claims on Scottish Budget, following statements made by Andrew Neil on BBC Sunday Politics Show, 18th October.
Time to Get Ready for the Second Biggest
Decision in 300 Years
Cuthbert, J. R.: published in Bella Caledonia, 16 November, 2015.
Argues that the decision which the Scottish Parliament will have to take soon on the post-Smith fiscal settlement will be one of the most important decisions for Scotland for many years: and that we need to be much more conscious of the implications.
download this paper
IFS report provides inadequate basis for
fiscal settlement negotiations
Cuthbert, J. R.: published as Jimmy Reid Foundation Working Paper No. 1, 2015: 11 December 2015.
Argues that there are significant dangers if the recent report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, on adjusting the Scottish government’s block grant, is taken as the basis for negotiating the post-Smith fiscal settlement.
Cuthbert, J. R.: part of presentation given at seminar on Fiscal Framework for
Scotland, Nuffield College, Oxford, 15 December 2015.
This is part of the presentation I gave at the above seminar: (the other part
of my presentation was based on my JRF Working Paper critique of the IFS Report:
see previous item.) What this table does is to outline some of the
characteristics of the broader decision space within which the current
negotiations on the fiscal settlement should be taking place. Has to be read in
conjunction with the JRF Working Paper.
Fiscal Settlement: Flawed IFS Report Bad News for
Scotland
Cuthbert, J. R.: Published in Bella Caledonia, 27th December 2015.
Refers to above JRF Working Paper, and highlights danger that Scottish negotiators may already have given up too much ground in the secrecy surrounding current fiscal settlement negotiations.
download
this paper
Crucial importance of the Smith fiscal settlement
Cuthbert, J. R.: published in the Scots Independent, Issue no 1043, January 2016.
Another piece highlighting the dangers of Holtham indexation.
Dangers posed by imminent fiscal trap
Cuthbert, J. R.: published in Scottish Left Review, Issue 91: January/February
2016.
This is a fuller version of an article published in the Scottish Left Review,
pointing out the trap the Scottish government is in danger of falling into in
the current fiscal settlement negotiations, and calling for an end to the
secrecy surrounding the negotiations.
download this paper
Adjusting the Scottish government’s block grant:
Taking a wider perspective
Cuthbert, J. R.: Jimmy Reid Foundation Policy paper, published January 25, 2016.
Based on the above JRF Working Paper no. 1, this report includes a new final
section, describing and discussing the options for the fiscal settlement
outlined in the presentation I gave at the Nuffield seminar on 15 December.
Will a disastrous fiscal settlement be the
end for John Swinney?
Cuthbert, J. R.: published in Bella Caledonia, 7 February 2016.
As the self-imposed deadline for the completion of the fiscal settlement
negotiations draws near, this article argues that if John Swinney only manages
to secure the disastrous deal which currently looks in prospect – he should
resign.
Treasury attitude highlights another flaw in the fiscal settlement
Cuthbert, J. R.: published in Bella Caledonia, 24 February 2016.
Shows how flaws in the negotiating process for the recently agreed fiscal
settlement have led to a flawed deal, which is likely to have disastrous
consequences for Scotland.
Flawed process leads to a damaging deal
Cuthbert, J. R.: published in Scottish Left Review, Issue 92: March/April
2016.
Looks at why the re-negotiation arrangements which are part of the recently
agreed fiscal settlement are likely to be worth very little when we actually
need them.
The data requirements of devolution finance: how these
will impact on the central departments
Cuthbert, J. R.: paper for Scottish Economic Statistics Consultative Group
meeting, 19th May 2016.
This note considers what data will be required so that the funding
arrangements for the devolved administrations can be run effectively.
Scotland’s Last Fantasy Election?
Cuthbert, J. R.: Scottish Left Review”, Issue 93 June 2016.
Argues that there was a large element of fiscal fantasy in the conduct of the May 2016 Scottish elections: and that reality is likely to intrude before the next election.
Cuthbert, J. R.: Response to Scottish Government consultation on the future of
GERS, 6 July 2016.
This response discusses the information requirements stemming from the
post-referendum fiscal changes.
Scottish Government GERS and Brexit Reports:
sifting through to try to get to the real state of affairs
Cuthbert, M.: Commonspace, 26 August 2016.
A critique of the quality of the data in the recent GERS and Brexit reports
produced by the Scottish government.
Cuthbert, J. R.: Published on Commonspace, 29 8 2016.
This note argues that one of the key points missed in the discussion of the
recently published GERS figures has been the future impact of Scotland’s new
post-referendum fiscal settlement.
Brexit and the Fiscal Settlement
Cuthbert, J. R.: published on Fraser of Allander Institute Blog, 27
September 2016.
Since agriculture is a devolved area, responsibility for agricultural support
payments, currently made under CAP, will revert to Scotland post-Brexit. This
note discusses some of the problems this will pose for the fiscal settlement
between Scotland and the rest of the UK.
download this paper
Issue with Scottish Government Borrowing
Powers in 2015/16 highlights need for greater openness – and scrutiny
Cuthbert, J. R.: published on Commonspace, 18 October 2016.
In July 2015, the Office for National Statistics classified the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route NPD scheme as being “on the books” of the Scottish government. As a result, the Scottish government decided to use its new borrowing powers to provide cover for this and similar schemes. This note examines some of the implications of this decision.
download this paper
Adjusting the Block Grant Abatement: the Algebra of CM
and IPC
Cuthbert, J. R.: Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary, vol 40, no. 3, December 2016.
This note develops a simple algebraic expression for the difference between the CM and IPC methods of indexing the Block Grant Abatement, and explores some of the implications.
The Prudential Code: flimsy fig leaf in the
coming storm
Cuthbert, J. R.: Jimmy Reid Foundation Policy paper, published December 2016.
This paper identifies problems with the operation in Scotland of the
Prudential Code for local authority capital finance, and makes suggestions for
change.
Comments on Budget Scrutiny Consultation
Cuthbert, J. R.: paper submitted on behalf of Jimmy Reid Foundation to the Scottish Parliament Budget Policy Review Group, before giving oral evidence on 30 March 2017.
This paper identifies some of the information requirements stemming from the process of setting the Scottish budget – particularly those requirements stemming from the operation of the post-referendum fiscal settlement.
Evidence to the Economy, Jobs and Fair Work Committee
Cuthbert, M.: September 2017: Evidence submitted to the Committee’s inquiry,
before giving oral evidence on 19th September.
Evidence submitted to the Committee’s inquiry into the accuracy, utility and
clarity of Scottish economic statistics: the note makes extensive
recommendations for improvement.
Implications of the Fiscal Settlement for the
Requirement for Economic Data
Cuthbert, J. R.: Evidence for the Economy, Jobs and Fair Work Committee:
September 2017.
Considers the implications of the post referendum fiscal settlement for the
requirement for economic data.
Ironic that SNP is batting off Cambridge Analytica probe when Scottish Government’s major weakness is data
Cuthbert, M.: Sunday Herald 22 April 2018.
Argues that there will be little progress in tackling the problems of the
Scottish economy until a culture of secrecy surrounding important aspects of
Government performance is overcome.
How the design of the fiscal settlement potentially builds in excess forecast variability: and what can be done about it
Cuthbert J. R.: paper submitted to the Finance Committee before the Budget Round
Table meeting on 26 September 2018.
Explains why the way the current fiscal settlement has been designed has
certain adverse implications, which are likely to lead to increased uncertainty
in the forecasts of the resources available within the Scottish budget.
Scotland’s 53% marginal tax rate for middle
earners illustrates yet another flaw with the Fiscal Settlement
Cuthbert J. R.: published in The National 31 January 2019.
Describes how the awkward interface between devolved and reserved powers
leads to anomalous, and damaging, tax effects.
PAC Report Perpetuates Dangerous Myths about the
Barnett Formula
Cuthbert, J. R.: published in The National, 15th August 2019.
Shows how the PAC report on the Barnett Formula fails to disperse dangerous
myths about the formula: and fails to identify dangers with the new
post-referendum fiscal settlement.
Scottish Local Authority Borrowing from the PWLB
Cuthbert, J. R.: submitted to Treasury consultation on the PWLB, 4th June 2020.
Analyses the database of Public Works Loan Board loans to Scottish local
authorities, in order to examine whether the recent availability of cheap PWLB
loans has led to borrowing which is potentially problematic.
Ambiguous No More: Time to De-mystify
the Barnett Formula
Cuthbert, J. R.: published in Scottish Affairs, Vol 29, Issue 3, August 2020.
Detailed analysis of the history and performance of the Barnett Formula,
bringing out, in particular, the significance of the changes made after the
independence referendum.
download this paper
Colonial Mentality Not Dead Yet
Cuthbert, J. R.: a version of this paper was published in Commonspace Source on
17 August 2020.
Companion piece to the above Scottish Affairs article on Barnett. Goes on to
argue that both the old Barnett Formula pre 2016, and the new fiscal settlement,
can both be regarded as artefacts of a colonial system: and suggests how this
should be countered in the coming review.
download this
paper
Responsibility without power: the mark of the
mug through the ages
Cuthbert, J. R.: published on the Commonweal News Feed, 23 June 2022: and also
on Jubilee Scotland website.
This paper describes the impossible position the Scottish Government finds
itself in, having walked into the trap of taking responsibility for operating
the current devolution fiscal settlement without adequate powers.
The Turkey that voted for Christmas (Twice): How poor negotiation of the Fiscal Settlement has failed Scotland
:Cuthbert, J. R.:. Commonweal Policy Paper published 23 November 2023.
Describes how adverse the recent review of the devolution fiscal settlement
is for Scotland, and suggests what needs to be done.
download this paper
How the Treasury Outplayed Scotland on the Fiscal
Settlement Review
Cuthbert, J. R.:. edited version published on The National website 23
November 2023.
Largely a brief resume of the previous article, but gives new insight into
the Treasury negotiating tactics derived from a recent freedom of information
request.